I'll try not to repeat what the other reviewers have already said and just express my opinion on the book. It is sad but all too true that the poor seldom speak for themselves. And even though they may live a few blocks away, it requires a prolonged ethnographic study like Venkatesh's to get the picture of their daily lives and economic relations. And the picture he paints is indeed fascinating. Sterile academic words like "gang activity" or "narcotics" that Venkatesh uses contrast with the stark reality and the daily struggle that the urban downtrodden have to lead. This is probably the single most important reason to read this book. The book provides a comprehensive survey to the twisted economic and social life of the "shady world": there is a chapter on "soccer moms", on business people on street hustlers, the preachers and on the street gangs. However, the main feel that I got for Marquis Park is that of a place of crushing poverty and despair. The anecdotes and live situations are bizarre yet possess their own underlying logic: a gang leader as a person to turn to to mediate conflicts; a garage owner paying his mechanics with used radio equipment instead of cash; a church leader "placing" his parishioners into the homes of the affluent, getting a cut of their wages and then "rotating" them to make sure they do not lose their dependence on him; the small business owners fostering relationships with each other through small loans to secure against tough economic circumstance; the same business owners are afraid to operate outside the ghetto because the operating environment is so insecure and the relationships inside the community provide the meager support in case of hard times. It is breathtaking how the residents of Marquis Park completely gave up on the safety net of the modern state and, as in primitive societies, rely on their children to provide care and support in their old age. The author's sympathy towards his subjects shows often in the book and make it a far more pleasurable read. However, this comes with a lot of effort on the reader's part. Venkatesh writing style is circular and repetitive. The book starts from the death of the gang leader and ends with it. This would be a nice narrative device if it were not for mind-numbing continuous retreading over the same thoughts, ideas and facts. And it is not that Venkatesh repeats himself word-for-word but he just goes over the same territory and re-references or re-stresses or reiterates ad nauseam. At some point I started treating the books as a primary source --- a witness account rather than a synthetic scholarly work. Another major complaint is the scatterbrain treatment of the material. With all the repetition, some of the important economic background and the history of the formation of the ghetto is tucked in somewhere in the middle of the book. For example, the ghetto got so poor because most of the blue color jobs that the ghetto residents used to be able to get were shipped overseas. This fact is mentioned offhandedly in the introduction of one of the middle chapters. Another major annoyance is the lack of numbers and statistics in the book. How difficult was it to state what the number of people in Marquis Park was? How many of them actually migrate out of it? It seems that there is a constant outflow of people. What is their average income? How does it compare to the other American inner cities? What are the economic dynamics of it? They have become poorer in the last twenty years, but by how much? The author claims there is no adequate policing. How many policemen are there per resident? How does it compare to other parts of the city? The author claims there is overcrowding. How many square feet are there per resident? and so on. At last it would not have hurt this book to provide some sort of an idea of what is required to better the lot of the residents of Marquis Park.