I looked at the first chapter. It is a classic memoir. That is, a plain recollection of events, starting from the author's childhood and pre-war years (he was born on the Far East of the USSR to the family of railroad workers, his father died in the GULAG and both of his brothers died in WWII, Pyltsyn himself volunteered for the army in the first days of the war). From the writing style he sounds like a dyed in the wool Soviet career soldier. The first chapter is full of little details about the soviet life that I find endearing and I am sure you'll appreciate. So, I vote we read it. A word of caution - Pyltsyn is a "primary source". He reads like an extended battlefield report augmented by an impossible number of cliches and a few personal anecdotes. I guess since he is a career officer, that's what he writes. I hope that the poetry of his that he includes is not translated as it is atrocious. So, he is no Stephen Ambrose. Actually, he is more of a Richard Winters (of the Easy Company) type. Probably even far more heroic. He nonchalantly describes him leading an attack with 80% casualty rate, another attack over a minefield and an attack over the Oder River where only 13-some people out of his company survived. His love and adventures with his wife-to-be are touching (despite the horrible poetry). Pyltsyn is a model Soviet citizen and a communist through and through. He is the resident of the country where sex did not exist. Actually, his memoirs (except for the incredible heroics and the interesting composition of his battalion) is fairly typical of Soviet literature. Back in the days, it felt like this was the only kind of literature that was allowed to exist (which is why reading was not much fun). Apparently, Pyltsyn is well known as he cites several newspaper articles and books about himself. One of his annoying features is his constant chatter about medals and military decorations. If feels that it never dawned on him (he was 21 when the war was over) that it is not a costume party. I much rather like Winters' grim determination. Anyhow, it takes a bit of Ambrose and Spielberg to imagine the events described by Pyltsyn. It is interesting how the penal soldiers yearned to get into hand-to-hand combat, something the Germans seldom withstood. It seems that the fighting was to get to the enemy trenches and to hack them up there. The penal battalion as described by Pyltsyn seems like a reasonable if harsh enterprise: their weapons were modern and in good supply, they were well-fed and officered. Also, since the penal battalion was composed of convicted officers, they were motivated to fight.