Anyhow, I am on page 129. He just described how in europe governments and people are skittish about giving gay and lesbian couples reproductive rights (artificial incemination, surrogacy) while americans are being rather liberal on that account. In Britain/France/Norway/Switcerland there are laws against assisting gay or even umarried women with artificial incemination. This kind of refreshing with us constantly talking about americans being socially backward and reactionary. Then, Churlin talks about British (the closest to the US european state with respect to family policy) politicians debating measures of keeping the children's parents together for the children's wellbeing. Which sounds somewhat constructive compared to, Bush's Healthy Marriage Initiative. I picked him up again. On page 157. Chapter 6 is on relation of the movement of the population and divorce rates. Interesting stats and explanation. Counties with higher percentage of people that move in (Florida and Western States sans Mormon-Utah) have higher the divorce and suicide rates: people have weaker community ties. Emile Durkheim is invoked. He then goes for about 10 pages about the "go west, young man" american migration mentality. The discussion goes nowhere. Okay, I could not sleep so I finished Churlin. The penultimate chapter - class analysis is the most interesting. Churlin apologizes for half a page that he had to consider class. Most probably because it undermines his whole thesis. The marriage behavior varies significantly by income level (he uses college education instead) and recent changes in marriages and cohabitation are explained well by people's economic circumstance. Decline in blue-collar work led to the rise in co-habitation and fragility of marriages while promoting having a baby as the only reward and fulfillment available to uneducated women. Some of the figures he provides. The number of women who become single mothers during their mid-twenties to mid-thirties did not change for college educated whites since 1965 and for college educated blacks since 1980 (where it probably became a guarantee of stable income) while it more than doubled for women with high-school diploma or less. The probability that the first marriage ends in divorce for a woman without high school diploma and with college degree is 34% and 13% respectively. 33% of people without high-school diploma will divorce or separate within five years. 60% will eventually do so. Race is a stand-in for economy. Only two out of three black women will marry and 70% of their marriages will end in divorce or separation (47% among whites) divorce rate among the college educated actually declined since 1990ies. The last chapter is mostly the Venkatesh-like repetition of the rest of the book. Occasional silliness is mixed in. Churlin demonstrates the failure of government and societal policies of pressuring people to marry. He suggestion changing the slogan to "slow down" and take your time selecting the partner. So, one failed idealistic policy should be changed to another.